Here’s the official book trailer for Department of Elegy, thanks to Upside Down Dog Productions.
Here’s the official Spotify soundtrack for Department of Elegy, too. At first I was going to try to make this all covers, but I would have to leave too many important cuts out, so it’s a mix. If possible, listen in order. Enjoy!
Every semester, on many different campuses, undergraduate students sit around a seminar table and discuss their poetry in a workshop setting. Sometimes they find not just competition, but allies and friends among those fellow poets, and occasionally those friendships last beyond the academic year, well past the submission of the final portfolio. Matthew Thorburn and Mary Biddinger have been friends since the early 1990s, when they were classmates in the creative writing sub-concentration at the University of Michigan. Little did these two young Michiganders know that decades later they would be mid-career poets with newly published collections, returning to their beloved Ann Arbor for a reading at Literati Bookstore. Rather than enumerating their old favorite coffee shops and best poetry readings of yesteryear, Mary and Matt had a conversation about their past and current projects, life as working poets, and what’s next for their writing careers.
MT: Mary, I’ve been a reader and admirer of your poems going all the way back to our undergrad days. Fast-forward to today and you’re the author of six books and a chapbook, including your latest book, Partial Genius. How do you keep going? How have you kept the practice of writing poems fresh and exciting over the years?
MB: Thank you so much for asking. I attribute much of my poetry energy to robust coffee consumption and feelings of being haunted. Thankfully, both of these commenced when I was an undergrad, if not before, so I may be riding a similar wave of dark roast into this new decade. Another aspect of poetry that’s enduring is a state of never quite having it figured out, and the exhilaration that ensues when realizing how much there is left to learn. I remember in our poetry workshops of yesteryear, how with every new round of poems there was an overwhelming sense of excitement that resonated beyond the task of discussing poems in an academic context. That has not changed for me over the years, and I hope it never fades.
MB: Matt, it’s a delight still being in touch after all of these years, and as I teach my own undergraduate poets I often think of those early experiences with poetry that made us connect so deeply with the craft. Looking back at your days as a beginning poet, is there any particular moment that stands out as being important to your choosing poetry as an art form?
MT: If there was one particular moment for me, it was the day I was flipping through our textbook in my 11th grade lit class—we were supposed to be reading Antigone—and found Lawrence Ferlinghetti’s “Fortune has its cookies to hand out…” and Allen Ginsberg’s “First Party at Ken Kesey’s with Hell’s Angels.” I’d read Dickinson and Frost and some W.C.W. the year before in American Lit, but these two poems—wow. That was it for me. I didn’t know poetry could do the things they did. Sixteen-year-old me was blown away.
My tastes and favorites have changed a lot in the years since then, but that was the day the door really opened for me. A few years ago I got to see Ferlinghetti at the 92nd Street Y in New York and he read that poem and others from his early books. “I still love reading these old chestnuts,” he said. I do too.
Mary, I’d like to shift gears a little here and ask you about your new book, Partial Genius, a collection of prose poems. Over the past year I’ve been mostly writing prose poems myself, so I’m curious to ask: What draws you to this form? And are there ways in which writing a prose poem is a different experience for you from writing a poem in lines?
MB: Among the other serious matters I pondered as an undergraduate, I grappled with the question of which genre would be my primary focus in creative writing. As someone who loves fiction and reads it not just for pleasure but for sustenance, I aspired to end up a short story writer, if not a novelist. However, life demands and limited attention span kept me solely in the terrain of the poem, the prose poem, and the short short story, and these pieces have increasingly found their way into my repertoire over the years.
I let the poems of Partial Genius take the lead when working on the project. Did I set out to write a book about France, relationship disappointments, industrial dance music, and being a college student? Not in the least, but these things kept bubbling up and I let them. I’m currently working on two book projects at once, and one of those two is another volume of prose poems. The new book focuses on a pair of graduate school roommates and their adventures in the late 90s. The prose poems are not written in four or five stanzagraphs, as in Partial Genius, but in larger blocks. I had a similar experience of feeling like they were very rewarding and kind of easy to write, rather than the “passing gallstones” experience of composing a traditional lineated poem.
MB: Many of my students are thinking about careers beyond the academy, and I wondered what advice you might have for poets working outside a university setting. I’m very jealous of the idea of leaving one’s work at work, and being free from stacks of grading and constant prep work. How would you advise writers who are starting out as poets and as professionals in a different discipline? Where might they look for literary community?
MT: Mary, it’s funny you ask that because many days I find myself envying my friends who teach at universities and wishing I worked in your world! But over the years I’ve found that working as a writer and editor in the corporate world complements my poem-writing life—providing financial stability and a regular schedule. As you said, most days when 5:30 rolls around I do get to leave my work at work. I recommend it as a way to earn your living as a writer, especially if you don’t feel a calling to teach.
I got started on this path through several internships—both on campus and then at a public relations agency—and that’s a good way to try it out and see if this works for you. I was surprised back then (and it’s still true today) how much demand there is for people who can write good sentences and tell stories in an engaging way on the page. The fundamentals of marketing writing and creative writing aren’t so different.
But I do think this path can make it harder to create and maintain a sense of literary community—and there can be a sense of being on the outside looking in. However, I’ve kept in touch with a few friends from my MFA program and my undergrad days (like you!), as well as extended my own literary community through conferences and writing book reviews and interviewing writers. On the flip side, that sense of being a bit outside of the poetry world can be a relief at times, and probably helps me just hunker down and write.
Speaking of careers, I wanted to ask about your work as an editor—and your experiences working with editors. You’ve published several collections now with Black Lawrence Press, including Partial Genius. You’ve also edited the Akron Series in Poetry for more than a decade, shepherding many wonderful books into the world. Thinking about your experiences on both sides of the table, what do you see as the key ingredients for an effective author-editor relationship?
MB: This is a great question to ponder! I think that being an editor makes a poet even more choosy about the handling of their own publications, so I got really lucky when finding Black Lawrence Press, a publisher with both aesthetic compatibility with my work and the kind of attentive support that I like to give our authors at the University of Akron Press. BLP publishes many more books than we do at the UAP, but they still do so much to shepherd each collection from manuscript to reality.
In terms of key ingredients for the ideal author-editor relationship, I would say that communication is quite important. Both at BLP and UAP there are different staff members who handle certain aspects of the process, so poets should make note of the best place to send particular queries for the most efficient response. Additionally, some poets need more help than others, especially when bringing a first book into the world, so I would recommend sending clear and specific questions to the editor, which makes it a lot easier to provide helpful answers. Rather than asking, “Does this book need something extra,” a poet might say, “I’m wondering if I should reverse the order of the penultimate poem and the final poem in the first section. What are your thoughts on this?”
MB: Matt, thinking about past work, I wondered if you ever return to older poems (perhaps even poems from undergrad days) and try to re-enter their world. Or do you leave past work in the past instead? If you do look back at older work, was there anything about your early efforts that surprised you? I was kind of amazed by some of the risks I took as an undergrad poet, for example. That girl was pretty bold.
MT: It’s funny you should ask that because my new book, The Grace of Distance, actually includes a handful of “older” poems—including one I wrote as an undergrad (!) and one from grad school. This book grew out of a folder I kept adding poems to over the years, as I put previous books together. This was my “b-sides” folder, a growing collection of poems I liked and felt were very good poems, but that just didn’t fit into those books for thematic reasons. Eventually I reread them and realized they didn’t fit in those books mainly because they were all about their own theme, exploring different ideas of faith (finding it, losing it, wondering what it is in today’s world). Recognizing that common thread helped guide me as I wrote the more recent poems that make up most of that book.
Looking back at my earlier books, I guess I’m interested and maybe a little surprised to see how much my first two books are about wordplay and working with sound almost as much as meaning. And in that sense some of the poems feel riskier to me too. Since then I’ve gravitated more toward narrative in my work.
Having talked about early work, can we wrap up with a sneak peek at our current projects? I’m working on two new projects that are formally very different from one another. The first is a book-length sequence of poems written in the voice of a teenage boy, about his experiences in a time of war and its aftermath. In these poems I do something new for me: write without punctuation. This is a formal practice I was skeptical of for years, until I read Leslie Harrison’s The Book of Endings. Leslie’s work completely changed my outlook and helped me find a way into this subject I had been thinking about. The other project, as I mentioned earlier, is writing prose poems, which I’ve been doing for a solid year now. I’m starting to sense the faint outlines of a book here too, as I keep returning to certain themes and stories, but I’m trying to take it poem by poem and just see how it unfolds.
What are you working on now?
MB: Those both sound like cool current projects, Matt, and thank you for asking about what’s in the works. For the first time, I myself have two manuscripts in progress at once. I do not recommend it, though it sounds like you are in a similar situation. I have one project about a pair of roommates and their adventures in grad school in Chicago in the late 1990s. I have another project comprised of smaller poems about ordinary things (or at least that’s how I am describing it right now). Both of these projects are 50+ pages long, and I’m still adding to them. Contrary to the way that I’ve worked in the past, I am now making an effort to take my time with these manuscripts. I’m thinking the roommates book (tentatively titled Apartment 1006) will be the first one finished, but who knows what the new year will bring.
Mary Biddinger’s poems have recently appeared in Psaltery & Lyre (“God’s Plan”) and Black Fork Review (three poems).
Matthew Thorburn’s poems have recently appeared on Verse Daily (“The Stag”) and New Limestone Review (two poems).
Mary Biddinger’s latest book of poems is Partial Genius(Black Lawrence Press, 2019). She teaches at The University of Akron and NEOMFA program, and edits the Akron Series in Poetry for The University of Akron Press. Poems have recently appeared in Court Green, Poetry,Tupelo Quarterly, and Waxwing, among others. She lives in a west Akron bungalow in a household of two adults, two teenagers, two dogs, and four cats.
Matthew Thorburn’s latest book of poems is The Grace of Distance (Louisiana State University Press, 2019). He’s also the author of six previous collections, including the book-length poem Dear Almost, which received the Lascaux Prize,and the chapbook A Green River in Spring. He works in corporate communications in New York City and lives with his wife and son in small-town New Jersey.
Once in a while a review helps you understand your own book better, and that is the case for Beth McDermott’s review of Partial Genius for RHINO. I am so grateful for Beth’s insights, and know that I will return to this review in the future when needing encouragement. For a minute I wondered, would it be weird to print out a review and frame it? I may just have to do that with this one.
Even though this is my sixth book, the feeling of unboxing never becomes less exhilarating and terrifying and awesome. Partial Genius arrived along with a number of back to school parcels, on a rainy day, and I’m glad I didn’t know the package would be arriving (I’m a worrier). My first thought upon unboxing was delight with the color of the cover. It’s cheerful and loud, as well as contemplative. I am grateful for the care that Amy Freels took with the cover design and the interior; I think I’ll be able to perform from this book without reading glasses, which is a plus.
Thanks to all who have offered congratulations and shared my excitement about this new book, my first collection exclusively made up of prose poems. Partial Genius is now in stock at Black Lawrence Press, and at SPD, as well. There’s a peek inside feature if you would like to read a few poems before buying a copy for yourself or your best friend or your secret crush.
TS: How do you balance your writing life with your work as an editor and professor? Do you have particular routines and practices that have sustained you?
MB: I have taught college English for over twenty years, and have been an editor for almost as long, and yet I am still struggling with balance. What has helped is learning how I function best, forgiving myself for that, and then finding a way to work with my tendencies instead of against them. I am motivated by deadlines. During the academic year I have little, if any, time for creative writing, so those are fallow spells and I’ve come to terms with them. Over winter and summer breaks I write obsessively. Ideally during the academic year I will revise poems and send them out, but often that task falls to summer.
My work flow is one of constant triage. I jokingly tell friends that I am not a good custodian of my own writing, and it’s true. Helping other people with their poems and manuscripts is often top priority, and more enjoyable than working with my own poems. Perhaps someday I will no longer be scrambling, but for now it’s the scramble that keeps me moving.
I am thrilled that Partial Genius was one of the Must-Read Poetry Books for August 2019 over at The Millions. Thank you to Nick Ripatrazone for thoughts like these:
Biddinger’s prose poems are eccentric, meandering, and surprising. The first poem of the collection, “Historical Achievements,” ends: “One year I wrote ‘mouth’ across my knuckles for Halloween and exited the pep rally before the microphone was switched on, flocks of balloons still humping the plastic bags designated to contain them.” The sentence is pure Biddinger: funny, dizzying yet specific, and grounded in a pleasantly wistful storytelling (her poems don’t often feel melancholy, but they do contain absences—incomplete stories—which offer pauses of sentiment within her play). Partial Genius is unlike any book of poetry that you’ll read this year; a credit to Biddinger’s voice, and the range of her interests.
I am over the moon about having my poem “Heaven and Dirt” published in the new issue of Tupelo Quarterly (15) with such excellent company. This is a recent poem, and I’m thrilled that it found such a fine home.
Also, much gratitude to the editors and fellow contributors of Waxwing XV. I’m honored to have these four poems appear in the issue. “Fantasy Sports” and “History Town” are two prose poems from my forthcoming collection Partial Genius, so this makes me extra excited.
For a year or so I had inexplicable anxiety about sending work out. I am much more comfortable helping other people with their creative work, and really needed to think through my trepidation and take steps to eliminate it. And now that these poems are out, I have no excuses about getting more work into the atmosphere.
In other news, we received a record-breaking total of 687 submissions to the 2018 Akron Poetry Prize competition. You know what I’ll be doing for the next two weeks.